2007 VQ HR Dyno Results
#1
2007 VQ HR Dyno Results
The 2007 VQ HR dyno results!
Comparative dynos of the NON-REVUP AT and the REVUP MT have been included to illustrate the relative differences of the three engines.
As you can see in the plots below the 2007 HR engine completely shadows the prior generations in both peak power, torque and in area under the curve by a very large margin.
I've seen both the prior engines with all the boltons can do similar numbers to eachother, but the HR engine greatly exceeds what any amount of boltons can do to the other engines.
Congratulations to Nissan for really stepping up to the plate and doing a great job on this latest engine. Let the modding begin!
2004 AT Vs 2007 AT
http://www.motordyneengineering.com/images/HR_Vs_NON_REVUP.gif
2005 MT Vs 2007 AT
http://www.motordyneengineering.com/...R_Vs_REVUP.gif
And the HR 6MT on the same dyno.
Comparative dynos of the NON-REVUP AT and the REVUP MT have been included to illustrate the relative differences of the three engines.
As you can see in the plots below the 2007 HR engine completely shadows the prior generations in both peak power, torque and in area under the curve by a very large margin.
I've seen both the prior engines with all the boltons can do similar numbers to eachother, but the HR engine greatly exceeds what any amount of boltons can do to the other engines.
Congratulations to Nissan for really stepping up to the plate and doing a great job on this latest engine. Let the modding begin!
2004 AT Vs 2007 AT
http://www.motordyneengineering.com/images/HR_Vs_NON_REVUP.gif
2005 MT Vs 2007 AT
http://www.motordyneengineering.com/...R_Vs_REVUP.gif
And the HR 6MT on the same dyno.
Last edited by Hydrazine; 02-10-2007 at 09:43 PM.
#5
Professional
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Armitage
1) Numbers are a bit inflated, since this is a dynopack.
2) Did you use the same 2007 AT for both tests? Why did the 2007 AT have a difference of 11 lb-ft of tq between the two tests?
3) Still very impressive.
2) Did you use the same 2007 AT for both tests? Why did the 2007 AT have a difference of 11 lb-ft of tq between the two tests?
3) Still very impressive.
#6
1) Numbers are a bit inflated, since this is a dynopack.
Yes, but the deltas are what's important.
2) Did you use the same 2007 AT for both tests? Why did the 2007 AT have a difference of 11 lb-ft of tq between the two tests?
Yes. Its the same 2007 AT plotted against a non-revup AT and a revup MT.
You may be confusing the 2004 AT with the 2007 AT. The 2007 AT only has about 3ft-lb variation at the peak.
I had the Cipher data logger connected to the OBDII port but the Cipher data logger couldn't recognize the new ECU. ...So I couldn't monitor engine coolant temps. I simply allowed ~5min cooling time between runs to get a good ball park on the coolant temps.
3) Still very impressive.
Yes. This new HR engine really kicks.
Yes, but the deltas are what's important.
2) Did you use the same 2007 AT for both tests? Why did the 2007 AT have a difference of 11 lb-ft of tq between the two tests?
Yes. Its the same 2007 AT plotted against a non-revup AT and a revup MT.
You may be confusing the 2004 AT with the 2007 AT. The 2007 AT only has about 3ft-lb variation at the peak.
I had the Cipher data logger connected to the OBDII port but the Cipher data logger couldn't recognize the new ECU. ...So I couldn't monitor engine coolant temps. I simply allowed ~5min cooling time between runs to get a good ball park on the coolant temps.
3) Still very impressive.
Yes. This new HR engine really kicks.
Last edited by Hydrazine; 01-27-2007 at 07:48 PM.
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do you have a comparison of the 2007 with a rev-up with your spacer and MREV2. I think that would even the playing field. It sure seems like a good upgrade for folks with a non revup, but not for those with the rev-up. Still, I would say that Nissan is still doing a great job in their engine department.
Great post, thanks.
Great post, thanks.
Trending Topics
#8
Retired Admin
iTrader: (95)
That chart doesn't seem right. How's the revup putting down more tq than the non-revup? The whp I can understand. Those can't be stock revup and non-revup powers.
Armitage-
non-revup: 241.5 tq 258.1 whp
vs
hr: 254.7 tq 284.7 whp
revup: 249.5 tq 269.8 whp
vs
hr: 255.3 tq 284.8 whp
Where do you see a difference of 11 tq in the HR?
Armitage-
non-revup: 241.5 tq 258.1 whp
vs
hr: 254.7 tq 284.7 whp
revup: 249.5 tq 269.8 whp
vs
hr: 255.3 tq 284.8 whp
Where do you see a difference of 11 tq in the HR?
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 3hree5ive0ero
That chart doesn't seem right. How's the revup putting down more tq than the non-revup? The whp I can understand. Those can't be stock revup and non-revup powers.
Armitage-
non-revup: 241.5 tq 258.1 whp
vs
hr: 254.7 tq 284.7 whp
revup: 249.5 tq 269.8 whp
vs
hr: 255.3 tq 284.8 whp
Where do you see a difference of 11 tq in the HR?
Armitage-
non-revup: 241.5 tq 258.1 whp
vs
hr: 254.7 tq 284.7 whp
revup: 249.5 tq 269.8 whp
vs
hr: 255.3 tq 284.8 whp
Where do you see a difference of 11 tq in the HR?
#11
Originally Posted by dbasal
Do you have a comparison of the 2007 with a rev-up with your spacer and MREV2. I think that would even the playing field. It sure seems like a good upgrade for folks with a non revup, but not for those with the rev-up. Still, I would say that Nissan is still doing a great job in their engine department.
Great post, thanks.
Great post, thanks.
I will get a dyno plot of the HR Vs REVUP w/MREV2 & spacer.
#12
Originally Posted by 3hree5ive0ero
That chart doesn't seem right. How's the revup putting down more tq than the non-revup? The whp I can understand. Those can't be stock revup and non-revup powers.
Armitage-
non-revup: 241.5 tq 258.1 whp
vs
hr: 254.7 tq 284.7 whp
revup: 249.5 tq 269.8 whp
vs
hr: 255.3 tq 284.8 whp
Where do you see a difference of 11 tq in the HR?
Armitage-
non-revup: 241.5 tq 258.1 whp
vs
hr: 254.7 tq 284.7 whp
revup: 249.5 tq 269.8 whp
vs
hr: 255.3 tq 284.8 whp
Where do you see a difference of 11 tq in the HR?
#14
General & DIY Moderator
MY350Z.COM
MY350Z.COM
iTrader: (64)
Great post! After putting in all that work (80% of the HR is new), these dyno charts certainly show that Nissan delivered. On a side note, EPA test cycles indicate the VQ35HR also gets better mileage in both city and highway cycles. That's a hard combination to beat!
Kudos to Motordyne for publishing this information. We have more details on the VQ35HR in the Winter '07 issue of Nissan Sport Magazine with the '07 G35 review.
David Muramoto
Senior Editor
Nissan Sport Magazine
Kudos to Motordyne for publishing this information. We have more details on the VQ35HR in the Winter '07 issue of Nissan Sport Magazine with the '07 G35 review.
David Muramoto
Senior Editor
Nissan Sport Magazine
#15
Retired Admin
iTrader: (95)
Originally Posted by walkert
I think the rev up is a MT and the non rev is auto
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dkmura
Great post! After putting in all that work (80% of the HR is new), these dyno charts certainly show that Nissan delivered. On a side note, EPA test cycles indicate the VQ35HR also gets better mileage in both city and highway cycles. That's a hard combination to beat!
Kudos to Motordyne for publishing this information. We have more details on the VQ35HR in the Winter '07 issue of Nissan Sport Magazine with the '07 G35 review.
David Muramoto
Senior Editor
Nissan Sport Magazine
Kudos to Motordyne for publishing this information. We have more details on the VQ35HR in the Winter '07 issue of Nissan Sport Magazine with the '07 G35 review.
David Muramoto
Senior Editor
Nissan Sport Magazine