Notices
Brakes & Suspension 350Z stoppers, coils, shocks/dampers

The Final Answer to Rear Camber / Toe adjustments!! Battleversion Toe/Camber Arms

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-2005, 03:22 PM
  #1  
optionimports
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
optionimports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up The Final Answer to Rear Camber / Toe adjustments!! Battleversion Toe/Camber Arms



Battle Version suspension products, by Alex Pfeiffer,
came out with an answer to 350z rear camber / toe
adjustment needs. His products are widely used on
240sx, Supra, AE86 if any of you didn't know.

The 350z comes with a horribily designed suspension to
begin with, oem setup does not allow much of adjustment
in the rear, especially when the car is lowered, there's no
way the stock ecentric bolt will put you back to proper settings.




Battle Version Camber Link vs Stock


Battle Version Toe Link vs Stock
This toe link will only work with cars installed with true coilover setup in the rear, since it replaces the OE spring bucket.

These links allow easy adjustments, all you have to do is turn the rod one way or the other to get the desired setting, then tighten the nuts on both side.


set the rear to -1.0 camber. Toe is 1/16.


side shot of my car so you have an idea how low my car is



Corner weight and balanced. the car weights 3217lbs as you can see...


if you are interested in battle version products, please check the Vendor section, we'll do a special very soon.
Old 09-29-2005, 08:03 PM
  #2  
Enzo Driver
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Enzo Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How much for the Battle Version Camber Link?
Old 09-29-2005, 08:16 PM
  #3  
mike2016
Sponsor
OptionImports.com
 
mike2016's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's $275 shipped either camber or toe link. PM me if you are interested in buying it.


Here's the link to the special in vendor section.

https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=144927
Old 09-29-2005, 08:21 PM
  #4  
Blue Komodo
Registered User
 
Blue Komodo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OK, which coilovers are those? Specs, price?
Old 09-29-2005, 10:00 PM
  #5  
mike2016
Sponsor
OptionImports.com
 
mike2016's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

those are BuddyClub racing spec coilovers. PM me for price of the coilovers.

here is a review of the coilovers by me

https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....ight=buddyclub
Old 09-30-2005, 04:10 AM
  #6  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

...looks like everyone else's adjustable arms....there is no magic to making these pieces, but at least they ahvea good name attached to them
Old 09-30-2005, 05:10 AM
  #7  
daytona350z
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
daytona350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: newport beach. so cal
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
...looks like everyone else's adjustable arms....there is no magic to making these pieces, but at least they ahvea good name attached to them
yea, but they arent priced like stillen or jic's. and they offer a true spherical bearling unlike the spc/kinetix camber arms which have rubber bushings still
Old 09-30-2005, 09:40 AM
  #8  
spf4000
New Member
 
spf4000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SF, freezing my @ss off
Posts: 2,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can the rear damper mounts support additional stress from the springs? I wonder if it's going to eventually stress out the mounting points and begin cracking. The damper mounts on our cars weren't designed to support the weight of the car. The stock spring mounts seem a lot beefier than the damper mounts.
Old 09-30-2005, 09:44 AM
  #9  
Blue Komodo
Registered User
 
Blue Komodo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spf4000
Can the rear damper mounts support additional stress from the springs? I wonder if it's going to eventually stress out the mounting points and begin cracking. The damper mounts on our cars weren't designed to support the weight of the car. The stock spring mounts seem a lot beefier than the damper mounts.
OK, what he said.
Old 09-30-2005, 11:10 AM
  #10  
optionimports
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
optionimports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daytona350z
yea, but they arent priced like stillen or jic's. and they offer a true spherical bearling unlike the spc/kinetix camber arms which have rubber bushings still

The so-called "toe arm" by JIC / Stillen ARE NOT TRUE TOE ARMS, they replace the traction rod instead, and no matter how you adjust it, it won't change the toe at all. it will mess up the geometry of the suspension, those are mainly for adjustment of bumpsteer.

the only way to adjust rear toe is using the stock ecentric bolt, or using battleversion's method by replacing the lower spring bucket.
Old 09-30-2005, 04:13 PM
  #11  
aalzuhair
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
aalzuhair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Riyadh, SA
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spf4000
Can the rear damper mounts support additional stress from the springs? I wonder if it's going to eventually stress out the mounting points and begin cracking. The damper mounts on our cars weren't designed to support the weight of the car. The stock spring mounts seem a lot beefier than the damper mounts.
Anybody care to comment on the above?

Thanks,
Az
Old 10-01-2005, 12:54 AM
  #12  
daytona350z
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
daytona350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: newport beach. so cal
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by optionimports
The so-called "toe arm" by JIC / Stillen ARE NOT TRUE TOE ARMS, they replace the traction rod instead, and no matter how you adjust it, it won't change the toe at all. it will mess up the geometry of the suspension, those are mainly for adjustment of bumpsteer.

the only way to adjust rear toe is using the stock ecentric bolt, or using battleversion's method by replacing the lower spring bucket.

yea i know, i was promotibng battle version. i know that the toe arms are total bull**** from jic/stillen. i was just saying these are better constructed for a fraction of the price.
Old 10-01-2005, 04:29 AM
  #13  
JDMFairlady21
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
JDMFairlady21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by spf4000
Can the rear damper mounts support additional stress from the springs? I wonder if it's going to eventually stress out the mounting points and begin cracking. The damper mounts on our cars weren't designed to support the weight of the car. The stock spring mounts seem a lot beefier than the damper mounts.
+1 on the comment aboved bout this as well... also since they are spherical bearings, are there any creaking or other noises associated with these?
Old 10-01-2005, 06:54 AM
  #14  
Nano
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Nano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aalzuhair
Anybody care to comment on the above?

Thanks,
Az
I haven't looked at the rear-end geometry, but from my understanding, the nominal load on the damper mount would be the same whether the spring is attached to the the damper mount or to the spring mount.
Old 10-01-2005, 07:01 AM
  #15  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I see my post was deleted...why, I have no idea.

Anyway, I have a different firms toe arms and camber arms on my car, and can confirm that yes you can in fact adjust toe with them....stating otherwise is not a fair representation of what else is on the market.

I am not owing loyalities to anyone on this mind you, as frankly I can count on one hand how many sets of other guys "arms" we have moved (aside from SPC). The ones I use are not even sold to the public, and may never be (they are very very slow with stuff sometimes). However, to state that it does not adjust toe when in fact it does (I've got several alignment settings we use on my car to prove it), is not a fair criticism of the products. Now, perhaps this is a better means of said adjustment..I honestly do not know the answer as I have not sat down to truly study the geometry of the car in depth, aside from the cursory look when we installed items and try them out
Old 10-01-2005, 08:00 AM
  #16  
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Kolia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spf4000
Can the rear damper mounts support additional stress from the springs? I wonder if it's going to eventually stress out the mounting points and begin cracking. The damper mounts on our cars weren't designed to support the weight of the car. The stock spring mounts seem a lot beefier than the damper mounts.
Hard to say.

But for the EOM mounts being beefier, remember that these mounts offer very little mechanical adventage (ie no leverage). The spring have to be very stiff to give an average spring rate at the wheel. (I read somewhere the spring is only 35% effective at that location).

So the load at the damper would not be that much more.
Old 10-01-2005, 08:08 AM
  #17  
aalzuhair
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
aalzuhair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Riyadh, SA
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nano
I haven't looked at the rear-end geometry, but from my understanding, the nominal load on the damper mount would be the same whether the spring is attached to the the damper mount or to the spring mount.
Well, looking at the stock rear lower arm, makes me think that this part has more stress on it than the upper spring mounting point. However, should we change it to a coilover, I would think that it would increase the stress on the upper mounting point. Don’t ask me for any explanation because I don’t have it … but that’s just the way I look at it until some can explain it. Other than that, I would think that the stock location would provide less stress on any single point... having said that, maybe you can use both a coilover and the stock location ??? I don't know


At any rate, can someone explain the benefit in real-life of using a coilover in the rear versus the stock setup.

Thanks,

Az
Old 10-01-2005, 08:11 AM
  #18  
aalzuhair
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
aalzuhair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Riyadh, SA
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kolia
Hard to say.

But for the EOM mounts being beefier, remember that these mounts offer very little mechanical adventage (ie no leverage). The spring have to be very stiff to give an average spring rate at the wheel. (I read somewhere the spring is only 35% effective at that location).

So the load at the damper would not be that much more.
And this would also increase the stress on the upper mounting point of the shock
Old 10-01-2005, 08:15 AM
  #19  
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Kolia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aalzuhair
At any rate, can someone explain the benefit in real-life of using a coilover in the rear versus the stock setup.

Thanks,

Az
Other than the concern for load distribution. None. It's a design choice. Stock location is more compact on the sides, but intrude on cargo space. Not an issue on the Z, the rear diff is already screwing up the trunk space.


On a race car, you want all your suspension members to by as long as possible. Longer members will reduce loading. Allows for smaller spring rate and damping. In turn this will affect the natural frequency of the suspension.
Old 10-01-2005, 08:19 AM
  #20  
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Kolia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aalzuhair
And this would also increase the stress on the upper mounting point of the shock

Yes. It will increase for sure. But how much? Less than we might think at first.

Too much? I don't think so. The chassis is stiff enough.

Track your car seriously, and you will get rattles anyways.


Quick Reply: The Final Answer to Rear Camber / Toe adjustments!! Battleversion Toe/Camber Arms



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:45 PM.